Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.
Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.
Title: FOUNDATIONS OF HUMAN RESOURCES Ethan Bunn Case Study
Description: Lord of the Fries, a casual burger chain with restaurants throughout the country has been charged by the EEOC with refusing to accommodate the religious needs of an employee and then illegally firing him.
Description: Lord of the Fries, a casual burger chain with restaurants throughout the country has been charged by the EEOC with refusing to accommodate the religious needs of an employee and then illegally firing him.
Document Preview
Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above
HRM532: FOUNDATIONS OF HUMAN RESOURCES - CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDY
Lord of the Fries, a casual burger chain with restaurants throughout the country has been charged
by the EEOC with refusing to accommodate the religious needs of an employee and then illegally
firing him
...
As part of his practice, Bunn
went through a rite of passage where he received religious inscriptions in the form of tattoos
...
The inscriptions symbolize his
dedication and servitude and his beliefs make it a sin to intentionally conceal the religious
inscriptions
...
The
restaurant has a dress code policy that prohibits employees from having visible tattoos
...
It should be noted that Bunn signed a Handbook Acknowledgment that included the
Dress Code Policy
...
He sought an exemption from
the dress code, but the restaurant refused to provide it or any alternatives
...
"
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires employers to make reasonable accommodations to
sincerely held religious beliefs unless it would cause undue hardship to the business
...
The restaurant claimed
that covering the tattoos was a BFOQ
...
Make an argument for BOTH, the employer and employee?
2
...
If you are HR, what do you decide?
Answer
Make an argument for BOTH, the employer and employee?
In this world, we are born and created to be equal
...
In this case scenario, there is a religious issue between Ethan Bunn and
his employer
...
Based on the U
...
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC) who is responsible for upholding government regulations that make it illicit to
oppress a task candidate or a representative due to the individual's race, shading, religion, sex
(counting pregnancy, transsexual status, and sexual direction), public beginning, age (40 or older),
disability or genetic information
...
Most worker's organizations and
business offices are additionally covered
...
● On his side, he was discriminated of not providing reasonable accommodations with regard
to his religious beliefs
...
It includes traditional,
organized religions like Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism
...
● A few practices are strict for one individual, but not strict for someone else, like not
working on Saturday or on Sunday
...
Under Title VII,
training is strict assuming that the worker's justification
Title: FOUNDATIONS OF HUMAN RESOURCES Ethan Bunn Case Study
Description: Lord of the Fries, a casual burger chain with restaurants throughout the country has been charged by the EEOC with refusing to accommodate the religious needs of an employee and then illegally firing him.
Description: Lord of the Fries, a casual burger chain with restaurants throughout the country has been charged by the EEOC with refusing to accommodate the religious needs of an employee and then illegally firing him.