Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.
Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.
Title: Alastair Norcross's "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Ethical Reflections on Meat Consumption."
Description: Alastair Norcross presents a thought-provoking argument in his essay "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases," which challenges the ethical presuppositions surrounding meat consumption. Norcross employs the concept of "marginal cases" as a means to underscore the inherent inconsistency in our ethical treatment of animals, where he argues that it is imperative to extend the same level of moral consideration to pigs and other animals bred for food as we do to puppies and other animals kept as companions. Norcross casts doubt on our capacity to discern particular distinctions between them and directs our focus toward the ethical significance of our dietary decisions.
Description: Alastair Norcross presents a thought-provoking argument in his essay "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases," which challenges the ethical presuppositions surrounding meat consumption. Norcross employs the concept of "marginal cases" as a means to underscore the inherent inconsistency in our ethical treatment of animals, where he argues that it is imperative to extend the same level of moral consideration to pigs and other animals bred for food as we do to puppies and other animals kept as companions. Norcross casts doubt on our capacity to discern particular distinctions between them and directs our focus toward the ethical significance of our dietary decisions.
Document Preview
Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above
1
Institution
Instructor
Course
Name
Date
Alastair Norcross's "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Ethical Reflections on Meat
Consumption
...
Norcross employs the concept of "marginal cases" as a means to
underscore the inherent inconsistency in our ethical treatment of animals, where he argues that it
is imperative to extend the same level of moral consideration to pigs and other animals bred for
food as we do to puppies and other animals kept as companions
...
Norcross's essay incites a contemplative discourse and
examination of the ethical ramifications associated with the differential treatment of animals,
contingent upon their perceived worth or societal functions (Norcross 7)
...
2
One potential counterargument to Norcross's thesis is the assertion that humans possess a
different moral status due to their cognitive abilities, self-consciousness, and capacity for moral
decision-making
...
While acknowledging the importance of treating animals with compassion,
individuals may contend that the freedom to decide our dietary preferences constitutes a matter of
personal autonomy
...
The subject matter encompasses contemporary issues such as the increasing popularity of
vegetarian and vegan dietary choices, the adverse environmental impacts associated with factory
farming, and the ongoing scientific exploration of laboratory-developed alternatives to meat
...
Moral consideration involves the weighing of circumstances to
make a substantial choice
...
Regarding the extension of moral
consideration to animals commonly consumed for sustenance, it is worth noting that Norcross's
argument primarily centers on exposing the inconsistencies within our moral reasoning rather than
advocating for granting equivalent rights to animals as those enjoyed by humans
...
The above perspective promotes exploring alternative approaches that foster
coexistence between humans, animals, and the environment
...
These coexistence approaches include reducing meat
consumption, advocating for more compassionate agricultural practices, and experimenting with
plant-based dietary choices
...
Norcross invites us to critically examine the ethical consequences of our actions and our treatment
of animals, highlighting the deficiencies in our moral reasoning
...
4
Work Cited
Arthur, John
...
Puppies, Pigs, And People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases: 1-17
Title: Alastair Norcross's "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Ethical Reflections on Meat Consumption."
Description: Alastair Norcross presents a thought-provoking argument in his essay "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases," which challenges the ethical presuppositions surrounding meat consumption. Norcross employs the concept of "marginal cases" as a means to underscore the inherent inconsistency in our ethical treatment of animals, where he argues that it is imperative to extend the same level of moral consideration to pigs and other animals bred for food as we do to puppies and other animals kept as companions. Norcross casts doubt on our capacity to discern particular distinctions between them and directs our focus toward the ethical significance of our dietary decisions.
Description: Alastair Norcross presents a thought-provoking argument in his essay "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases," which challenges the ethical presuppositions surrounding meat consumption. Norcross employs the concept of "marginal cases" as a means to underscore the inherent inconsistency in our ethical treatment of animals, where he argues that it is imperative to extend the same level of moral consideration to pigs and other animals bred for food as we do to puppies and other animals kept as companions. Norcross casts doubt on our capacity to discern particular distinctions between them and directs our focus toward the ethical significance of our dietary decisions.