Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.
Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.
Title: abstract spectral theory 2
Description: a brief introduction to symmetric operator
Description: a brief introduction to symmetric operator
Document Preview
Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above
Abstract spectral theory 2
Hu xiyu
September 8, 2016
1
Adjoint operator
definition:for a Hilbert space H,for a linear operator A : H → H,we have
the adjoint operator of A,called A∗ ,we have map:
B(H) → B(H) : (A, D(A)) −→ (A∗ , D(A∗ ))
where D(A∗ ) is definite as:
D(A∗ ) = {y ∈ H|∃η ∈ H, ∀x ∈ D(A), < Ax, y >H =< x, η >H }
A∗ : D(A∗ ) → H, y → A∗ y = η
2
A theorem of Von Neumann
Theorem 1 For every unbounded operator A with domain D(A) dense in
H,we have: ker(A∗ ) = (Im(A))⊥
...
remark:If A is bounded
...
in
fact:
D(A∗ ) = {y ∈ H|∃η ∈ H, ∀x ∈ H, < Ax, y >=< x, η >}
1
x →< Ax, η > is a bounded linear functional
...
beside we also have:|||A∗ ||| = |||A|||,but i do not konw how to prove it
now
...
every self-adjoint operator is symmetric
...
definition:unbounded symmetric operator is positive iff:
< Ax, x >H ≥ 0, ∀x ∈ D(A)
4
Two theorem concerning |||T |||
Theorem 2 |||T ||| = sup | < T x, x >H |
||x||H ≤1
proof:
|||T ||| =
sup
||T x||H
||X||H ≤1
=
sup ||T x||H ||X||H
||x||H ≤1
≥
sup | < T x, x >H |
...
(2)
||x||H ≤1
(1),(2) ⇒ Q
...
D
Theorem 3 ||T x||2 ≤ |||T ||| · | < T x, x >H |
H
proof:
definite a(x, y) =< T x, y >H
a(x, y) bilinear form , positive-definite
...
e:||T x||2 ≤ | < T x, x >H | · |||T |||
...
E
...
5
A crucial prop
prop:
(A, D(A)) symmetric operator,∀x ∈ D(A), ∀λ = µ + iγ ∈ C, γ = 0,
||(λI − A)x||2 ≥ γ 2 ||x||2
H
H
3
proof:
||(λI − A)x||2 = < (µI − A)x + iγx, (µI − A)x + iγx >
= ||(µI − A)x||2 + i < γx, (µI − A)x > −i < γx, (µI − A)x > −||γx||2
= ||(µI − A)x||2 − ||γx||2
⇒ ||γx||2 ≤ ||(λI − A)x||2
and we have ||γx||2 = γ 2 ||x||2
...
E
...
proof:
Ker(λI − A) = 0
(λI − A)x||2 ≥ γ 2 ||x||2 ⇒ ker(λI − A) = 0
...
e to prove: if (λI − A)xn = yn , ∀n ∈ N ∗
...
E
...
the following prop
are equivalent:
(1)A is self-adjoint
...
(3) Im(A ± iI)=H
...
(1) ⇒ (2):
(x, Ax),||x||H + ||Ax||H
(2) ⇒ (3):
< Ax, y >=< x, A∗ y >⇔< (A ± iI)x, y >=< x, (A∗
¯
A = A ± iI,we have,by theorem 2:
∗
¯
(ImA )⊥ = (kerA)
...
e ∀x ∈ D(A) = D(A∗ )
< Ax, y >=< x, Ay >
∀y ∈ H,∃x1 , x2 ∈ H:
(A + iI)x1 = y, (A − iI)x2 = y
< Ax, y >=< Ax, (A + iI)z >=
Q
...
D
5
Title: abstract spectral theory 2
Description: a brief introduction to symmetric operator
Description: a brief introduction to symmetric operator