Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.
Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.
Title: Structural Realisim
Description: Structural Realism taught in International Relations class in details. RIT Kosovo.
Description: Structural Realism taught in International Relations class in details. RIT Kosovo.
Document Preview
Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above
Structural Realism - International relations 19/10/2016
In political matter, only great powers matter, even though legally in an anarchic view all states
are “equal”
...
States are rational powers whose main goal is survival
...
The security dilemma is very apparent in every state
because you don’t know their intentions
...
If I have MORE power you have LESS power
...
TWO SCHOOLS OF REALISM: OFFENSIVE REALISM (MODERN) AND DEFENSIVE REALISM (OLD)
Defensive realists say: you need as much power as you need to have security
...
(No maximum power; yes maximum security)
...
)
Conquest pays-off
...
Offensive realists say: you need as much power as possible (you’re safe when you’re the hegemon
because you never know how much power is enough)
...
Don’t allow in other places for others to become the hegemon, by helping the
weaker ones
...
e doesn’t want China to become regional hegemon in Asia therefore it’ll help
Japan etc
...
)
Offense-defense balance in favor of who strikes first
...
Conquest does not pay-off
...
What causes wars?
The answer is in the system where it tells you if a war is likely or not
...
If you have many
enemies causes more misunderstandings resulting in threats, you’re not safe cause multiple
potential enemies
...
Balancing is more effective
(direct confrontation)
...
Security dilemma is applied
...
Unipolarity – No security dilemma, hegemonic stability, no major war
...
If you see one state competing for power you strike for a
war because you want to prevent someone to become a threat to you
...
Challenging state: Japan attacks USA because they were becoming powerful so they attack USA to
keep their power rising
...
China VS USA:
-
-
As China grows more powerful in next 10/20 years, it will try to reach the hegemonic state it
will become a threat
...
If you’re Chinese
you want to be more powerful than Russia, India and Japan because it is the best way to survive
in an anarchic system
...
Our ancestors went to different lengths
to become this powerful
...
If you have a choice,
remove your enemies, to establish regional hegemon and not have any threats close
...
Optimistic argument: Because of simplification you leave out other factors that don’t seem
important and that’s why theories are sometimes wrong
...
Other powers want to defeat you
resulting in wars
...
wars are more likely to happen because a
state becomes more advanced than their competitor and can start a (nuclear) war
...
Title: Structural Realisim
Description: Structural Realism taught in International Relations class in details. RIT Kosovo.
Description: Structural Realism taught in International Relations class in details. RIT Kosovo.