Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.
Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.
Title: Utilitarianism Overview
Description: A brief overview of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's take on the ethical theory of utilitarianism. Includes strengths and weaknesses for both and also some useful quotes from the two. Taken from AS Level Religious Studies.
Description: A brief overview of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's take on the ethical theory of utilitarianism. Includes strengths and weaknesses for both and also some useful quotes from the two. Taken from AS Level Religious Studies.
Document Preview
Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above
Utilitarianism
An ethical theory behind the justification for ‘the
greater good’
...
Key Words:
General Strengths
Assumes human well being is intrinsically good
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
– Matthew 7:!2
Motives may be good or bad but only consequences
have an effect
Encourages democracy
Situational Flexibility
Doesn’t rely on metaphysical principles
Teleological – the end justifies the
means
...
Hedonism – an ethical theory that
determines what is right or wrong
in terms of pleasure
...
Act utilitarianism – an action is morally good if it produces the most happiness and pleasure
...
It was a egalitarian system
...
It is good if it produces pleasure and happiness, and a good act is
one that produces the most pleasure and happiness
...
Hedonic Calculus – Bentham’s way of numerically calculating a moral decision
...
The quantitative nature makes the most people possible happy
...
The hedonic calculus provokes meaningful thought on what our actions
should be
...
We should overlook
our individual differences and look towards the ‘greater good’
...
This is fair in a democracy
...
By only focusing on happiness and pleasure, utilitarianism reduces morality
from its complex nature to something far simpler that can be followed with
mottos
...
The ends do not always justify the means:
Hitler aimed to bring about the ‘greatest good for the greatest number’, yet
we know that he was not a moral person
...
John Stuart Mill, 1806 – 1873
‘On Liberty and Utilitarianism’, 1859
Saw flaws in Bentham’s theory, so devised his own
...
There are higher and lower pleasures
...
Lower pleasures are physical – they satisfy the body
...
”
Once you have experienced both higher and lower pleasures, you can be a
competent judge of other actions
...
There should be a harm
principle in ethics so this is avoided
...
General rules should be devised, that can be applied to individual situations
...
Claims that the Hedonic Calculus is far too time consuming for practical, everyday use
...
Ultimately, Mill would break a rule (and therefore rule utilitarianism) if breaking it leads to
the greatest happiness
...
to save a life, it may not only be allowable, but a duty, to steal, or take by
force, the necessary food or medicine, or to kidnap, and compel to officiate,
the only qualified medical practitioner
...
For example, we should
allow people to smoke in private even though smoking leads to terrible illness etc
...
Strengths
Is also hedonistic – focuses on pleasure and happiness, which is important
...
The focus on the qualitative nature allows us to expand our unique human abilities as we
strive for higher pleasures
...
Operates without God – you do not have to follow a scripture
...
As a human race we are too immature and selfish for
utilitarianism to work in society
...
It is elitist – those who live in poverty or are poorly educated cannot access higher pleasures,
such as reading and discussing philosophy
...
Higher and lower pleasures are hard to define – why should a sexual relationship be lower if
it produces as much (or more) happiness than a friendship?
Rule utilitarianism is too rigid – it fails to take into account the complexity of individual
situations
...
Equal value is important – “My interests cannot, simply because they are my
interests, count more than the interests of anyone else”
What would people rationally prefer to happen? What will be better in the
long run?
What is in the best interests of all people involved?
You must concentrate on minimising the suffering rather than maximising
the pleasure
...
Replaces pleasure with ‘best interests’
...
Sidgwick – motives: it is the motive (intending to bring about the greatest good) rather than
the outcome that is good
Singer – interests: you need to look at what is in the best interests of those affected (some
people call Singer a 'welfare Utilitarian')
Title: Utilitarianism Overview
Description: A brief overview of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's take on the ethical theory of utilitarianism. Includes strengths and weaknesses for both and also some useful quotes from the two. Taken from AS Level Religious Studies.
Description: A brief overview of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's take on the ethical theory of utilitarianism. Includes strengths and weaknesses for both and also some useful quotes from the two. Taken from AS Level Religious Studies.