Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.
Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.
Title: THE THEORY OF LIMITS
Description: DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO DEFFERENTIATING DIFFERENT LIMIT AND DERIVATIVES
Description: DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO DEFFERENTIATING DIFFERENT LIMIT AND DERIVATIVES
Document Preview
Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above
CHAPTER 03
THEORY OF LIMITS
FORMAL DEFINITION OF A LIMIT
In the previous chapter we provided an intuitive definition of a limit, and we stated, but
did not prove, a number of useful limit theorems
...
The intuitive definition earlier introduced is
correct
...
What do we mean
with close?
In everyday life the use of “close” is relative, but in mathematics we need a more precise
description
...
Definition 3
...
(ii)
A neighborhood of a point c is an open interval (a,b) such that c (a,b)
...
They
will almost always represent small positive quantities
...
2
Suppose that the function f is defined near a point c (i
...
in a neighborhood of a point c)
...
The inequality 0 < |x - c| that appears in the definition means “x is not c”
...
The two inequalities
combined as a single statement 0 < |x - c| < describes the open interval
( c - , c + ) from which c is deleted
...
The formal definition of a limit requires that for every open interval about L,
34
(L - , L + ), no matter how small, we can find an interval ( c - , c +) about c, of
whose function values lie within that interval about L
...
No matter how small is chosen, can
be made small enough so that f(x) lies within a distance from L
...
y
L+
L
L-
x
0
c- cc+
Definition 3
...
Definition 3
...
Examples:
1
...
Now,
|(3x-1)-5|
= |3x-1-5|
= |3x- 6| = |3(x- 2)|
= |3 ||x-2| = 3 |x-2|
35
|(3x-1)-5|
= 3 |x-2| < if
|x-2| < /3
Thus we can take = /3
...
Any smaller positive will also work
...
(iii) The value of depends on the value chosen for
...
It does not
mean the two statements are equal, and should not be used in the place
of “=”
...
Show that lim x 4 1
x -3
Solution:
Given any > 0, we must find a > 0 such that if 0 < |x+3| < , then
| |x+4|-1| <
...
From the properties of absolute values it follows that
|x+4| - |1| ≤ | |x+4|-1| <
Hence
|x+4| - |1| <
Or
|x+4| < + 1
From the properties of absolute values follow:
- ( + 1) < x + 4 <
- -1
< x+4 <
- -2
< x+3 <
- -2
< x+3 <
- -2
< x+3 <
|x + 3| < + 2
Therefore we can choose = + 2
3
...
Now, we know (x3 -1) = (x-1)(x2+x+1)
Hence, if
|x3 - 1| <
|x-1||x2+x+1| <
(i)
We observe that the expression |x-1| we are looking for appears on the left hand
side, but we also have the expression |x2+x+1| for which we must find a
replacement
...
If
|x-1| < 1
Then
-1
0
-2 < 0 < x < 2
-2 < x < 2
|x| < 2
Therefore
|x2+x+1| ≤ |x2 | + |x |+ |1| < 22 + 2 + 1 = 7
From expression (i) follows that |x-1||x2+x+1| < 7 |x-1| <
|x-1| <
= min{1,
Therefore
7
7
}
EXERCISES
Use the formal definition of a limit to show that
lim (x 6) 5
1
...
x 5
3
...
x 1
lim (x 2 2x 1) 2
5
...
x 2
lim 2x 2 6
7
...
x 5
lim 1 5x 4
9
...
x 3
2 x 3 5x 2 2 x 5
lim
7
x 1
x2 1
11
...
x0
37
THEOREMS ON LIMITS
Theorem 3
...
x c
x c
Proof:
We use a method of proof called “Proof by contradiction”
...
Assume M ≠ L then
Since
LM
2
> 0
...
2
lim f(x) M , for each =
LM
x c
if 0 < |x-c| < 2 , then |f(x) - M| < =
LM
2
2
> 0 there exists a 2 > 0 such that
...
It follows that for each 0 , there exists 0 such that
|L - M|
= |[L – f(x)] + [f(x) – M]|
≤
|-[f(x) – L]|+|f(x)-M|
=
|f(x) - L|+|f(x)-M|
<
=
LM
2
+
LM
2
|L - M|
The conclusion |L - M| < |L - M| is a contradiction
...
Remark:
Since the definition states “………for each > 0 there exists a > 0…
...
Theorem 3
...
For each
> 0 there exists a > 0 such that if 0 < |x - c| < , then
a
|f(x) - L| <
a
a
|a||f(x) - L| < |a|
| |a|f(x) - |a|L| <
| af(x) - aL| <
Therefore
lim[a f(x)] =
a lim f(x) = aL
x c
xc
Theorem 3
...
2
39
Also since lim g(x) L 2 , then for each
x c
0 < |x - c| < 2, implies |g(x) – L2| <
> 0 there exists 2 > 0 such that
2
...
For each > 0, there exists > 0 such that
0 < |x - c| <
|f(x)+g(x) - L1 - L2|
=
|(f(x)- L1 ) + (g(x) - L2 )|
≤
|f(x) – L1|+|g(x) – L2|
<
+
2
2
=
Therefore,
lim[f(x) g(x)]
= lim f(x) + lim g(x)
x c
xc
=
xc
L1 + L2
Theorem 3
Title: THE THEORY OF LIMITS
Description: DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO DEFFERENTIATING DIFFERENT LIMIT AND DERIVATIVES
Description: DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO DEFFERENTIATING DIFFERENT LIMIT AND DERIVATIVES