Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.

Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.

My Basket

You have nothing in your shopping cart yet.

Title: Constrained optimisation in economics
Description: A summary on the Lagrange multiplier method and utility maximisation.

Document Preview

Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above


EECM 3714

Lecture 9: Unit 9

Constrained Optimisation
Renshaw, Ch
...

β€’ Suppose that we want to maximise/minimise 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑦) subject to a constraint, 𝑔(π‘₯, 𝑦)

β€’ max 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑦), s
...
𝑔(π‘₯, 𝑦)
β€’ min 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑦), s
...
𝑔(π‘₯, 𝑦)

β€’ Where: 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑦) is the objective function (the function to be minimised or maximised); and 𝑔(π‘₯, 𝑦)
is the constraint
...
2, Fig 16
...
5

THE LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER (LM) METHOD
β€’ Suppose that you have to optimize (min/max) 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑦), s
...
𝑐 = 𝑔(π‘₯, 𝑦)

β€’ Rewrite the constraint, so that 𝑐 βˆ’ 𝑔 π‘₯, 𝑦 = 0
β€’ Then, define a new function, the Lagrangian: 𝑉 = 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑦)+Ξ»(𝑐 βˆ’ 𝑔 π‘₯, 𝑦 )
β€’ Where f = the objective function
β€’ Ξ» = the Lagrange Multiplier (LM)
β€’ 𝑐 βˆ’ 𝑔 π‘₯, 𝑦 = the constraint

β€’ Note that the Lagrangian can also be written as 𝑉 = 𝑓 π‘₯, 𝑦 βˆ’ Ξ»(𝑔 π‘₯, 𝑦 βˆ’ 𝑐)
β€’ To find the values of π‘₯, 𝑦 that max or min V,
πœ•π‘‰ πœ•π‘‰ πœ•π‘‰

β€’ Find the first partial derivatives πœ•π‘₯ ; πœ•π‘¦ ; πœ•πœ†

β€’ Then set these partial derivatives equal to zero,
πœ•π‘‰

πœ•π‘‰

β€’ i
...
πœ•π‘₯ = πœ•π‘¦ =

πœ•π‘‰
πœ•πœ†

=0

β€’ Solve for π‘₯, 𝑦, πœ†
β€’ This is the first-order condition for constrained optimisation
...
2-16
...
526-7)

ECONOMIC APPLICATIONS
β€’ Cost minimisation subject to a production quota/constraint: π‘šπ‘–π‘› 𝐢 𝐾, 𝐿 s
...
π‘žπ‘œ = 𝑔(𝐾, 𝐿)
β€’ Dual problem: maximise output subject to a cost constraint: π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘ž 𝐾; 𝐿 s
...
𝐢0 = 𝐢(𝐾, 𝐿)
β€’ Maximise utility subject to a budget constraint: π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘ˆ π‘₯, 𝑦 s
...
𝑀0 = 𝑔(π‘₯, 𝑦)

β€’ Dual problem: minimize expenditure subject to a utility constraint: π‘šπ‘–π‘› 𝑀 π‘₯; 𝑦 s
...
π‘ˆ0 =
π‘ˆ(π‘₯, 𝑦)

COST MINIMISATION
β€’ Suppose that a firm’s cost function is 𝐢 = 𝑀𝐿 + π‘ŸπΎ, while its production function is π‘ž = π‘ž(𝐾, 𝐿)

β€’ Now suppose that the firm needs to meet a production quota, π‘ž0
β€’ The firm’s production quota/constraint is then π‘ž0 = π‘ž 𝐾, 𝐿 ⟹ π‘ž0 βˆ’ π‘ž 𝐾, 𝐿 = 0
β€’ This can also be written as π‘ž 𝐾, 𝐿 βˆ’ π‘ž0 = 0

β€’ Now suppose that the firm wants to minimise its costs subject to the production quota
...
9 & Fig 16
...
e
...


Use the Lagrange Multiplier method to find the values of 𝐿, 𝐾, πœ† that minimise the firm’s total

cost, subject to the constraint 100 = 5𝐾

1Ξ€ 2Ξ€
3
3

𝐿

b
...


c
...
e
...
t
...


1Ξ€ 2Ξ€
3
3

𝐿


...
(1)
………
...
(3)

β€’ Divide equation (1) by equation (2) – LHS of (1) by LHS of (2) and
4
2

RHS of (1) by RHS of (2) β†’ =
β€’ β†’ 2 = 2𝐾

1Ξ€ βˆ’(βˆ’2Ξ€ )
3
3

πΏβˆ’

1Ξ€ βˆ’2Ξ€
3
3

10Ξ€ πœ†πΎ 1ΰ΅—3 𝐿 βˆ’1ΰ΅—3
3
5Ξ€ πœ†πΎ βˆ’2ΰ΅—3 𝐿 2ΰ΅—3
3

β†’ 2 = 2πΎπΏβˆ’1 ; ∴ 𝐾 = 𝐿

β€’ Substitute K (or L) into equation (3)

β€’ β†’ 100 = 5𝐾

1Ξ€
3

𝐾

2Ξ€
3

⟹ 100 = 5𝐾, ∴ 𝐾 = 20 ⟹ 𝐿 = 20

β€’ Solve for πœ†: Plug 𝐾 = 𝐿 = 20 into eq
...
(2)]: 4 =
10Ξ€ πœ†(20)1Ξ€3 (20)βˆ’1Ξ€3 , ∴ πœ† = 1
...
2 (in this case, = MC

SOLUTION:
β€’ Show that W/R = MRTS
𝑀𝑃𝐿
𝑀𝑃𝐾
1
1
𝑀𝑃𝐿 = 10Ξ€3 𝐾 Ξ€3 πΏβˆ’ Ξ€3
2
2
𝑀𝑃𝐾 = 5Ξ€3 𝐾 βˆ’ Ξ€3 𝐿 Ξ€3

β€’ 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 =
β€’
β€’
β€’

𝑀𝑃𝐿
𝑀𝑃𝐾

=

10Ξ€ 𝐾 1ΰ΅—3 𝐿 βˆ’1ΰ΅—3
3
5Ξ€ 𝐾 βˆ’2ΰ΅—3 𝐿 2ΰ΅—3
3

=

β€’ Since 𝐾 = 𝐿 = 20 β†’

2𝐾
𝐿

= 2πΎπΏβˆ’1

𝑀𝑃𝐿
𝑀𝑃𝐾

= 2 20 20βˆ’1 = 2

β€’ Given 𝐢 = 4𝐿 + 2𝐾 β†’ 𝑀=4 and π‘Ÿ = 2
β€’

𝑀
π‘Ÿ

β€’ ∴

4
2

= =2
𝑀
π‘Ÿ

= 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 = 2 if 𝐿 = 𝐾 = 20

OUTPUT MAXIMISATION
This is known as the dual problem for the cost minimisation problem - work in opposite direction
...
3 𝐾 0
...
Also suppose that 𝑀 = 3; π‘Ÿ =
15; 𝐢 = 150
...
Find the values of 𝐾, 𝐿 that maximise production, subject to the cost constraint, i
...
max
(𝐿0
...
7 ) s
...
3𝐿 + 15𝐾 = 150
...
3 𝐾 0
...
3 𝐾 0
...
3πΏβˆ’0
...
7 βˆ’ 3πœ† = 0 ⟹ 0
...
7 𝐾 0
...
7𝐿0
...
3 βˆ’ 15πœ† = 0 ⟹ 0
...
3 𝐾 βˆ’0
...
3πΏβˆ’0
...
7
0
...
3 πΎβˆ’0
...
(1)
……
...
(3)

3πœ†

= 15πœ†
7

= 5 ⟹ 15𝐾 = 7𝐿 β†’ 𝐾 = 15 𝐿 (note that, here you can also make L the subject of the formula)

β€’ Plug K into (3): 150 βˆ’ 3𝐿 βˆ’ 15

7
𝐿
15

=0

β€’ ⟹ 150 βˆ’ 3𝐿 βˆ’ 7𝐿 = 0, ∴ 𝐿 = 15, 𝐾 = 7

β€’ 0
...
7 70
...
059
β€’ Thus, one unit increase in the cost constraint will lead to a 0
...
The price of x is 𝑝π‘₯ ,
while the price of y is 𝑝𝑦
...
This means that the consumer’s
budget constraint is 𝑀0 = 𝑝π‘₯ π‘₯ + 𝑝𝑦 𝑦
...
14 & Fig 16
...


β€’ Solve for π‘₯, 𝑦 and πœ†

β€’ In equilibrium,

π‘€π‘ˆπ‘₯
𝑝π‘₯

=

π‘€π‘ˆπ‘¦

𝑝𝑦

⟹

π‘€π‘ˆπ‘₯
π‘€π‘ˆπ‘¦

=

𝑝π‘₯
𝑝𝑦

⟹ 𝑀𝑅𝐢𝑆 =

𝑝π‘₯
𝑝𝑦

β€’ πœ† tells us by how many utils the utility function will change is the constraint increases by R1 (i
...

we have more income to spend on x and y)

EXAMPLE 1: UTILITY MAXIMISATION
β€’ A consumer’s utility function is π‘ˆ = π‘₯

1Ξ€
3

𝑦

2Ξ€
3


...

a
...
e
...


Show that

2Ξ€
3

s
...
120 = 4π‘₯ + 2𝑦
...
(1)

+ πœ† 120 βˆ’ 4π‘₯ βˆ’ 2𝑦 = π‘₯
πœ•π‘‰
πœ•πœ†

2Ξ€
3

2Ξ€
3

=0
1

2

2

1Ξ€
3

βˆ’ 4πœ† = 0 ⟹ 3 π‘₯ βˆ’ Ξ€3 𝑦

1

𝑦 βˆ’ Ξ€3 βˆ’ 2πœ† = 0 ⟹ 3 π‘₯

1

𝑦 βˆ’ Ξ€3 = 2πœ†β€¦β€¦β€¦
...
(3)

4πœ†

= 2πœ† β†’ 0
...
21

β€’ This means that if the budget constraint is increased (i
...
loosened) by R1, utility will increase by 0
...
5𝑦π‘₯ βˆ’1

β€’ Since π‘₯ = 10; 𝑦 = 40, this means that 𝑀𝑅𝐢𝑆 = 0
Title: Constrained optimisation in economics
Description: A summary on the Lagrange multiplier method and utility maximisation.