Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.
Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.
Title: British Services sector pre-1914 notes [Warwick University - EC303]
Description: Comprehensive notes on British Service sector Performance pre-1914. [Warwick University - EC303]
Description: Comprehensive notes on British Service sector Performance pre-1914. [Warwick University - EC303]
Document Preview
Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above
Lecture 5 & 6
Overview:
Shipping
Railways
Domestic banking
International banking
Conclusions
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Overview
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
(3) Britain’s productivity performance better in services than industry before 1914 in levels terms
i
...
whereas in manufacturing the USA had a 2:1 productivity lead, in services Britain had a small productivity lead
...
(4) Between 1870 and 1914, productivity growth more rapid in services in the USA and Germany than in Britain
...
To some extent, process of
catching-up inevitable as release of labour from agriculture in USA and Germany led to:
-Urban agglomeration
-Increased specialisation in services
(5) In some sectors: system of low-volume, high-margin business organised on a network basis under threat from
system of high-volume, low-margin business organised on hierarchical basis
...
(6) Key factors underlying growth of high volume, hierarchical forms of organisation in service sector were:
-Developments in communications technology which reduced problems of asymmetric information and allowing closer
contact between principal and agent in merchant/financial operations E
...
telegraph and telephone
-Growing volume of economic activity, which permitted greater specialisation in services, hence allowing task
simplification and easier monitoring of employee performance
(7) Extent to which low-volume, high-margin business based on networks remained viable varied between sectors
...
Growth of high-volume business began on railways, spreading rapidly to other parts of transport and
communications sector
(8) To the extent that human capital was specific to a particular organisational form, Britain ‘locked-in’ to network form of
organisation
This was strongest at a time when technological change favoured hierarchical forms of organisation
...
Tech change favoured US this period - GB doing as well as
it can but with diminishing returns?
(9)
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Shipping
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
(10) Merchant shipping a major GB success story from 1850s to 1914
...
With decline of US
fleet during Civil War, most serious challenge to GB dominance before WWI came from Germany, yet Germany’s share
of world merchant fleet remained well below 10% versus Britain’s share of nearly 1/3
...
(11) Shipping output grew at annual rate of 3
...
5% in total transport and communications, and 1
...
Labour force in shipping grew at only 0
...
a
...
9 % p
...
TFP growth less rapid at 1
...
a
...
Ships are becoming bigger, faster,
more efficient (some of which is capital - lots of it is TFP growth, so Brit doing well here
...
Pessimists often try to interpret retention of old technology as evidence of ‘entrepreneurial
failure’, but British merchant marine v
...
British sailing still using wooden ships well into C20 even though
they’ve been using steam for 50 years
...
(13) Harley (1971) shows that British ship owners rationally switched from sail to steam at different moments on different
routes because of differences in relative cost conditions
...
Main technical advance in
steam technology was reduction in coal use, important because steamships had to carry own coal, which reduced
capacity for carrying freight
...
Steam ships req a lot of coal which takes a lot of tonnage, so less space
...
Steamships established on 3,000 mile Atlantic voyages to northern USA by early 1870s and on 5,000 mile voyages to
New Orleans for cotton by mid-1870s
...
But again, this advantage to sailing ships fell over time
...
So not Ent Fail: using old tech where most profitable and new tech
where most profitable
...
(15) Boyce (1995): Success of British shipping based on networks
...
Requires flexibility: Brit has networks & therefore info
...
e
...
Pre-WW1 Brit was hub of connections and
shipping needs these connections - not a product that can be produced as well without them
...
*More a case of the changing environment becoming more orientated to play to US competitive
advantages
...
/ Regularity permitted establishment of permanent bureaucracy
performing repeated tasks that could be routinely monitored
...
/ Improvements in communications technology (telegraph, then telephone) made possible
continuous links with overseas offices, reducing need for initiative on part of employees and allowing continual
monitoring
...
Sailing everyday gives incentives for hierarchical management product structure
...
Nevertheless, to extent that Britain’s competitive
advantage based on exploitation of system of entrepreneurial networks, emergence of large scale hierarchical form of
organisation was an adverse development from Britain’s perspective
...
Greater development of large scale hierarchical form of
organisation in liner sector than in tramping sector also consistent with more serious threat to Britain’s position pre 1914
...
(19)
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Railroads
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
(20) Modern railway age, with iron rails and steam locomotives, began in Britain during 1820s
...
In 1870s US rail network just getting started - GB meanwhile has built all important big railways domestically
...
Two sides of rail industry = freight (handling coal + MGs + grain) + passengers
...
(22) With output growing at 2
...
4 % per annum, productivity actually declined over
period 1871-1911
...
Rail sector fell
bend in international and absolute terms
...
(23) Sluggish productivity performance on Britain’s railways contrasts with rapid productivity advance on US railroads
...
a
...
(24) Paish (1902) attributed this poor GB performance Ent Fail, failing to notice ways of doing this better
...
Kaldor) GB has first mover disadvantage in rail, it is overbuilt & others learns
what happens
...
This example used by
Frankel (1955) in his formalisation of the problem of technical interrelatedness and investment in a mature economy,
showing you don’t necessary want the best technology available to you
...
Even if this point conceded, general argument remains valid for other
types of rolling stock and locomotives
...
Productivity stats assume whole of sector is doing
badly
...
-We could argue that one of most significant effects of fragmented structure of British railways was a lack of
development of an effective managerial hierarchy - lack of hierarchical management and lack of vertically integrated firm
...
(28) Were railroads managed as well as possible, then? Crafts, Leunig and Mulatu argue not: Low TFP growth in the
sector (UK 1
...
1%, between 1890-1910) & there was highly variable performance across companies
...
Everyone sees railroads as having under performed - lack of productivity indicative of lack of competition perhaps?
Difficult to get competition in railroads: big EoS in rail and high sunk costs - natural monopoly
...
No “forced exit” for weak firms; “Entrepreneurial failure” is once again tied to non-competition (as in chemicals)
...
(30)
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Domestic Banking - commercial
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
(31) Domestic Banking
...
In 1825 all commercial
banks in England and Wales were private, by 1900 private banks outnumbered by joint stock banks
...
Branch banking consisted of lots of retail banks within a structure
...
Post 1900 = joint stock banks: shareholders capital at risk
...
Aggregation increased HH index
...
Previous paranoia from South Sea bubble
...
e
...
telegraphs, networks… improve, which are critical for banks as they settle
accounts
...
Shareholders whose banks are insolvent are only on
the hook for what they’ve put in - bankruptcy not possible at shareholder level
...
(34) Growth in scale of British banking system accompanied by an increase in stability
...
To some extent, greater stability was a result of greater scale, since large banks had greater potential than small banks
for pooling risks
...
Collins (1988) argues that growing professionalisation of banking also played a role: E
...
the establishment of
professional bodies
(Institute of Bankers in Scotland (1875) & English Institute of Bankers (1879))
...
(35) Emergence of stable oligopoly of ‘Big Five’ in banking raised possibility of collusion and avoidance of interest rate
competition
...
Griffiths suggests that Treasury and BoE acquiesced in these collusive agreements because they found it easier to
implement interest rate policy when dealing with small number of cartelised banks
...
Difficult to enforce regulation if there are few players
...
(36) Did banks fail British industry?
Contrast often drawn here with German system of universal banking, seen as highly supportive of German industry
...
(37) Many writers have argued that universal banking system systematically more supportive of industry than specialised
system, however, evidence in favour of this is weak: Often based on crude observation of faster industrial growth in
Germany than in GB, for which there could be many explanations
...
Banking
system often cited as a reason for Brit Failure, but Germans could be catching up for different reason: Gerschenkronian
catch-up
...
g, merchant banks) will be bigger
than equivalent German one - UK capital market at centre of world, stock markets are much more developed
...
(38) As with other services, finance provided on much greater scale in Britain than in Germany pre 1914, permitting
greater specialisation and sophistication
...
Once accepted that English
commercial banks part of more specialised system, their behaviour more understandable (i
...
cannot criticise them for
failing to make long term investments in British industry, since not their function)
...
(39) But we can assess how supportive they were of industry by examining short term lending behaviour: Little evidence
here to suggest English banks less supportive than continental counterparts
...
Were banks and industry very hostile? Not really - little evidence that
British banks aren’t doing their jobs: Brit banks are doing a perfectly good job of supporting industry
...
(41) Overseas investment preferences:
Often argued that British investment banks favoured overseas assets at expense of domestic industry: Evidence to
support argument does not stand up to close scrutiny - any lack of external finance for industry can be attributed more
plausibly to lack of demand than to lack of supply
...
Doesn’t seem to be a bias against British
industry: no divergence in looking at rates of return
...
If such a market imperfection had existed, we would expect it to show up in rates of return, but
Edelstein (1971) shows that no such bias existed
...
g
...
So, although actual risk of
overseas investment higher, not necessarily perceived as such: Possible reason for preference for overseas investment
...
These were City of London’s ‘Golden Years’ (Kynaston, 1995)
...
Discount houses also heavily involved in this international business, as inland bill of exchange replaced largely by
overseas bills: Another aspect of City’s international dimension was overseas banks: headquartered in London but acted
as clearing banks overseas, particularly in Empire
...
Became clearing house of the world: British banks centre of merchant bills/ commercial paper, which
circulated with London at heart
...
Given information asymmetries, this was a business where information networks were particularly important:
Chandlerian hierarchical management structures not appropriate for international finance pre 1914
...
Not
much advantage to having large Chandlerian factories/ firms - Brit comparative advantage suited to small, specialised
firm
...
British overseas banks able to build up strong network based system that capitalised on Britain's dominant role in world
trade
...
) gave Brit info advantage globally
...
International banking is Britain’s No
...
(48) Strong and growing link with Empire, particularly White Dominions: Share of White Dominions rose from 57% in
1860 to 71% in 1913, while share of Continental Europe fell from 3% to 2%
...
Also helped arrange loan issues for governments on London K market,
although merchant banks played larger role in this business
...
Trade intermediation such as currency conversions are done in Brit: other countries dependent on London for
financing
...
(49) City networks
Cassis (1994) collects information on bankers and bank directors from 10 private banks, 20 merchant banks, 7 discount
houses, 13 joint stock banks, 14 overseas (colonial) banks and BoE
...
Network is a
social network in London as well as an international network
...
(50) Intergenerational family tie strongest among private bankers and merchant bankers with 87% of sample sons of
bankers, effectively running family firm
...
B
...
Gentlemanly Capitalism: tight
connection between landed gentry and private banks
...
(52) Directorships
Were banking elite able to dominate industry through network of interlocking directorships? More than half the sample
had no more than 2 other directorships & only 5% sat on 8 or more boards (at any one time)
...
Private bankers no more likely than anyone else to sit
on boards of directorships
...
Confirms links between
aristocratic and banking circles
...
(54) Networks
Picture that emerges is one which often appears in literature on entrepreneurial failure: Family firms / Public school and
Oxbridge education / Marriage into aristocracy
...
But here, dealing with a thriving part of the economy… Conclusion: network form of organisation continued to be well
suited to international finance in the pre 1914 period
...
Banking, shipping, high spec
...
(55)
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Conclusions
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
(56) Britain in overall productivity leadership position in late C19 not because of high productivity in industry but because
of high productivity in services (and small agricultural sector)
...
Services productivity advantage is absolute but getting eroded
...
(57) GB also facing problem of adjustment to ‘industrialisation’ of services
...
(58) Variety of experiences:
-Railways: origin of big business in services
...
-Shipping: Britain still dominant in shipping pre 1914, especially on empire routes: Indication of potential future
problems with the emergence of large scale lines organised on hierarchical basis
...
Rational use of sail/steam (as depicted by Harley)
...
Banks were specialised, diversified and did will in supporting Brit Industry
Title: British Services sector pre-1914 notes [Warwick University - EC303]
Description: Comprehensive notes on British Service sector Performance pre-1914. [Warwick University - EC303]
Description: Comprehensive notes on British Service sector Performance pre-1914. [Warwick University - EC303]