Search for notes by fellow students, in your own course and all over the country.

Browse our notes for titles which look like what you need, you can preview any of the notes via a sample of the contents. After you're happy these are the notes you're after simply pop them into your shopping cart.

My Basket

You have nothing in your shopping cart yet.

Title: EMPLOYMENT LAW (lecture 11) - Health and safety.
Description: EMPLOYMENT LAW (lecture 11) - Health and safety.

Document Preview

Extracts from the notes are below, to see the PDF you'll receive please use the links above


EMPLOYMENT – HEALTH AND SAFETY
VICARIOUS LIABILITY - *Employer will be liable for the acts committed by
the employee in the course of his employment
...
*Liability for independent contractors is more
complex -Biffa Waste Services Ltd v Maschinenfabric GmbH *Modern test, see
Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd/ Fennelly v Connex South Eastern Ltd
...

HARASSMENT AND BULLYING *Protection from Harassment Act 1997
(civil liability for tort s
...
26 Equality Act 2010: harassment prohibited
generally
...
As such Health and Safety Executive
(HSE) was formed
...

Covers all employees, except domestic workers
...
Covers non-employees affected by activities carried out in
workplace
...
However, Act creates criminal sanctions
...

*The HSE is responsible along with enforcement officers, for enforcement and
prosecutions under the Act
...

*Improvement notices: S21: inspection of opinion that person contravening
statutory provision, or has done so and likely to be repeated, then can give an
Improvement Notice to remedy contravention – cannot be less than 21 days
...
*Can take effect immediately or after a certain
period
...

*Withdrawal of notice: A inspector may be withdrawn at anytime before expiry of
21 days or a deferred prohibition notice
...

*Effect on notice: Improvement notice suspended or withdrawn; Prohibition
notice only suspended if ET directs and only for a limited time
...
Breach of a statutory duty; 2
...
Absence of risk of any danger; and
4
...

1
...
Does not matter
that there has been no accidents
...

2
...
The ET will also take into account reputation of company
...
Absence of risk of any danger - South Surbiton Co-operative Society v
Wilcox ((even though the risk was minimal it was an absolute liability, so had to
fix the tile)/CF Associate Dairies Ltd v Hartley
4
...

*TC Harrison Ltd (Newcastle-upon-Lyme) Ltd v Ramsey
*Financial difficulties are no defence – otherwise a firm could have an advantage
over competitors, keeping down prices and undercutting them, but not following
requirements
...
* Factors to consider: efforts to remedy breach; strength of appeal;
was breach trivial (South Surbiton Co-Operative Society)
*Failure to comply with order - Criminal offence – no defence that
employer took reasonable practicable steps to comply with order
...
*ET only applies to civil matters
...
*Failure = contempt of court
...

*Consequences for breach: Up to 6 months custodial/ £20,000 fine
(Magistrates Court)/ Up to 2 yrs/ unlimited fine (Crown Court)
DUTIES OWED BY THE EMPLOYER - Section 2 – duties are owed by
all employers and extend to premises over which e’yer has actual control
...
Not absolute –
reasonably practicable
...

*Requirement to have a written safety policy: S
...
No guidance as to content – needs to
be prepared and revised
...
Should lay out responsibility of all employees, e
...

Board of Directors
...
This is an active duty
...
3: Covers lawful visitors and
those outside his premises
...
* The extent of this duty is conduct
undertakings
...

DUTIES OF EMPLOYEES - S
...
* S
...
Covers intentional and reckless interference/
misuse
...
44 Right not to suffer a
detriment in health and safety cases
...
100 Right not to be dismissed
unfairly in certain circumstances involving health and safety cases
...
Management of Health and Safety at work Regulations 1999
(as amended); Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992;
Provision and Use of Work Regulations 1998; Personal Protective
Equipment at Work Regulations 1992; Manual Handling Operative
Regulations 1992; Health and Safety (Digital Screen Equipment)
Regulations 1992
PENALTY OF BREACH - *Individual or organisations can be charged
and convicted
...
*Armour v Skeen: failure of senior
management in H&S policy implementation
...

*Reverse burden of proof - Under s
...
*Balance of probabilities: civil
standard
...
Then burden passes to
accused that they have done all which was reasonably practicable to avoid
risk
...
*An offence
requires: Manages or organises its activities which causes death, in a manner
which amounts to a gross breach of duty of care; Way in which senior
managers manage or organise substantial activities must be a substantial
element of the breach; A breach occurs when it falls below what can
reasonably be expected or organisation in the circumstances
...
This is rare!


Title: EMPLOYMENT LAW (lecture 11) - Health and safety.
Description: EMPLOYMENT LAW (lecture 11) - Health and safety.